Illusions of Knowing
Home Up Hermeneutics Belief Allocation Decisions Illusions of Knowing Indoctrination Deconstructing Precision Ideology Guides

 

Grad Studies Resources 81-503 Resources Sitemap
WebCT Lakehead Handbook PhD Seminars  
News PhD Handbook PhD Colloquia Cognition & Learning

 

 
Source: Piattelli-Palmarini, M. (1994). Inevitable illusions. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
From: Chapter 7 "The Seven Deadly Sins" Pages 115-137  

 

"Overconfidence" Many people show an unrealistic overconfidence in their answers to questions, even factual questions. "...the discrepancy between correctness of response and overconfidence increases as the respondent is more knowledgeable." (p.119) The more you know the more you need to guard against overconfidence. Be wary!
"Illusory Correlations (Magical thinking)" The person convinced of a "positive correlation...will always find new confirmations and justify why it should be so." (p122) "We are naturally... verifiers rather than falsifiers..." (p123) Good case for considering Karl Popper's philosophy of science--Conjecture and Refutation...
"Predictability in hindsight" "...we all honestly think we could have predicted what happened, as long as we know, or think we know, that it actually did happen." (p124) The "Historian's Fallacy"
"Anchoring" Our beliefs and opinions get arbitrarily "anchored" to such things as "first impressions," first opinions, context, propaganda, news reports, authorities, emotions ...and they are quite resistant to change. (Pride gets in the way)
"Ease of representation" Which is greater, death from suicide or death from homicide? Homicide gets reported so people typically report a greater death rate via homicide. "...the more the occurrence impresses us emotionally, the more likely we are to think of it as also objectively frequent." (p128) Be wary of your imagination!
"Probability blindness" "Any probabilistic intuition by anyone not specifically tutored in probability calculus has a greater than 50 percent chance of being wrong." (p132) We are "blind not only to extremes of probabilities, but also to intermediate probabilities..." (p131) Is our reaction to genetic engineering, nuclear power, pharmaceutical test demands rational? We have a non-rational "...peremptory desire that there be no risk at all...." (p131) 
"Reconsideration under suitable scripts" "...our judgment of probability allows itself to be influenced by fictions, including scenarios we know to be pure inventions." (p134) He calls this the "Othello Effect."