Thinking Tools
Home Up Thinking Tools False Memory? World Views Paradigms

 

Grad Studies Resources 81-503 Resources Sitemap
WebCT Lakehead Handbook PhD Seminars  
News PhD Handbook PhD Colloquia Cognition & Learning

 

 
Graduate Resources

 

 
 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Building A Toolkit

Matt Hetherington's

 (On Sternberg)

 Subtypes

3 Subtypes of Stupidity

The Stupid

Acquisition bias (preconceptions shape the search…)

Processing bias (preliminary conclusion dominates…)

Response bias (Probability of happy outcomes reigns…)

Entrenchment (past results predict future results…)

Availability heuristic (frequency perceptions distorted…)

The Foolish

Pride

Greed

Self deception

Slippery slope

 

The Ingrained

“We make people stupid by calling them smart” (Attribution theory)

 

James Lett's

FiLCHeRS

 Six Rules

Six Rules-A Field Guide to Critical Thinking

 

Falsifiability

Logic

Comprehensiveness

Honesty

Replicability

Sufficiency

Paul et al's

 List

35 Dimensions

35 Dimensions of Critical Thought

 

Some of them:

1. Flag - egocentricity and sociocentricity

2. Explore - the relation between thoughts and feelings

3. Develop virtues: humility, courage, perseverance, fairness

 

4. Compare analogous situations, perspectives, theories, models, sets of research, opinions

5. Gain Clarity: words, phrases, issues, beliefs, values

6. Examine credibility: of sources, generalizations, oversimplifications

7. Deepen: looking, listening, questioning, reading, analyzing, evaluating..,

 

Shermer's

 

 10-Step Guide

10 Step Guide to Baloney Detection

 

1. How reliable is the source?

2. Does this source often make similar claims?

3. Have the claims been verified by another source?

4. Does the claim fit with what we know about how the world works?

5. Has anyone tried to disprove the claim?

6. Where does the preponderance of evidence point?

7. Are the accepted rules of reason and research used?

8. Is the claimant providing an explanation or denying an explanation?

9. Is the new explanation better than the old explanation?

10. Do personal beliefs and biases drive the conclusions?