False Memory?
Home Up Thinking Tools False Memory? World Views Paradigms

 

Grad Studies Resources 81-503 Resources Sitemap
WebCT Lakehead Handbook PhD Seminars  
News PhD Handbook PhD Colloquia Cognition & Learning

 

 

 
 
Obtain and read the following two readings... from Free Reprints
1. Pope, K.S. "Pseudoscience, cross-examination, and scientific evidence in the recovered memory controversy." (#17)
2. Pope, K.S. "Science as careful questioning: Are claims of a false memory syndrome epidemic based on empirical evidence?" (#2)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Note The Critical Questioning Categories
1. Research--design, validity, existence of empirical data, general acceptance, how compelling? peer review, reliable instruments...

2. Clarity in Language and Logic--vagueness, equivocation, clear definitions

 

3. Confirmation Bias--are all positions treated fairly?
 
4. The Chain of Reasoning--does the argument cohere and are weak links noted?

5. Ad Hominem Fallacies--is the person attacked rather than the facts, and arguments, and theories?

6. Use of Sources--is there a reliance on secondary sources, and partial sources?
 

   
 
For in-class collaborative discussion...
To illustrate critical thinking what "questions" would you raise regarding this area (or these articles) and why?
What "critical" caveats, concepts, issues, etc. would you raise regarding this area (or these articles), and why?