| |
| Accent |
| Accident |
| Ad hominem |
| Amphiboly |
| Analogies |
| |
| Appeal to Antiquity |
| Appeal to Authority |
| Appeal to Consequences |
| Appeal to Crowd |
| Appeal to Emotions |
| Appeal to Fear |
| Appeal to Force |
| Appeal to Moderation |
| Appeal to Newness |
| Appeal to Pity |
| Appeal to Popularity |
| Appeal to the Poor |
| Appeal to Self-Evident Truth |
| Appeal to Tradition |
| Appeal to Wealth |
| |
| Apriorism |
| |
| Begging the Question |
| Bifurcation |
| Blinding with Science |
| |
| Circular Definition |
| Cliché Thinking |
| Complex Question |
| Composition |
| Concealed Evidence |
| Conflicting Conditions |
| Converse Accident |
| |
| Damning the Alternatives |
| Definitions--Too Broad/Too Narrow |
| Definition--Too complex |
| Dismissal |
| Division |
| |
| Equivocation |
| Existential Fallacy |
| |
| Gambler’s fallacy |
| Genetic Fallacy |
| Guilt by Association |
| |
| Intuition |
| Invincible Ignorance |
| Irrelevant Conclusion |
| Irrelevant Thesis |
| |
| Loaded Language |
| |
| Magical Thinking |
| Meaningless Claim |
| |
| Name Calling/Ridicule |
| Non sequitur |
| |
| One sided Assessment |
| Oversimplification |
| |
| Poisoning the Well |
| Provincialism |
| |
| Red Herring |
| Refuting the Example |
| Statistics |
| Biased question |
| Biased sample |
| Concealed quantification |
| False precision |
| Figures prove |
| Hasty generalization |
| Post hoc Fallacy |
| Sweeping generalization |
|
| Syllogism |
| Contradictory premises |
| Exclusive premises |
| Positive conclusion from negative premises |
| Fallacy of four terms |
| Illicit process |
| Undistributed middle |
|
| Scope--Too Limited |
| Scope--Too Broad |
| Shifting the Burden of Proof |
| Slippery Slope |
| Special Pleading |
| Straw Man |
| Style over Substance |
| Support is subverted |
| Support is nonexistent or biased |
| |
| Trivial Objections |
| Two Wrongs Make a Right |
| |
| Unaccepted Enthymemes |
| Unobtainable Perfection |
| Untestability |
| |
| Wishful Thinking |
| |
| You Too! |
|