Keynotes:

 

S. Bailin

 

A. Goldman

 

M. Finocchiaro

 

 

 

 

A. Alvarez                    “IL in the Philippines”

C. Gratton                    Commentary

 

P. Asquith                    “Meta-level of informal logic”

R. Binkley                    Commentary

 

M. Battersby                “Rhetoric of numbers”

A. Colijin                      Commentary

 

C. Beam                       “The fallacies of pity and fear”

E. Feteris                      Commentary

 

J.A. Blair                      “Philosophy of argument and argumentation”

T. Govier                      Commentary

 

C. Blatz                        “The spirit of critical thinking”

D. Turner                     Commentary

 

G. Boger                      “Formal foundation for fallacy theory”

R. George                    Commentary

 

 

C. Campolo                 “Common ground for conflict resolution”

T. Goodnight                Commentary

 

D. Cohen                     “Unjust argument theory”

R. Burke                      Commentary

 

P. Courtenay-Hall         “The ethics of teaching”

M. Gilbert                    Commentary

 

F. van Eemeren &

Houtlosser                    “New developments”

M. Finocchiaro             Commentary

 

E. Feteris                      “Unacceptable consequences”

D. Walton                    Commentary

 

J. Freeman                   “Progress on the dialectical tier”

H. Hansen                    Commentary

 

M. Gaurini                    “Connectionist coherence”

A. Bailey                      Commentary

 

M. Gilbert                    “The linguistically inexplicable”

C. Blatz                        Commentary

 

D. Godden                   “Deductivism as interpretive strategy”

E. Krabbe                    Commentary

 

J. Goddu                      “Context of an argument”

J. Freeman                   Commentary

 

J. Goodwin                   “Manifestly adequate premises”

J. Hoaglund                  Commentary

 

T. Govier                      “Relevence, emotion and consolation”

J. Bickenbach               Commentary

 

C. Gratton                    “Using counterexamples”

M. Battersby                Commentary

 

A. Gross                      “Scientific diagrams as arguments”

F. van Eemeren            Commentary

 

H. Hansen                    “Presumptions and burdens”

P. Houtlosser                Commentary

 

R. Harris                      “Rhetoric and incommensurability”

C. Willard                    Commentary

 

D. Hatcher                   “Personal values in argument evaluation”

P. Courtenay-Hall         Commentary

 

D. Hitchcock                “Testing in critical thinking”

D. Hatcher                   Commentary

 

J. Hoaglund                  “Truth in informal logic”

D. Allen                        Commentary

 

B. Huss                        “Being careful with paralogisms”

D. Boone                     Commentary

 

D. Jacquette                 “Socrates on rhetoric”

C. Tindale                    Commentary

 

R.H. Johnson                “Why visual arguments aren’t arguments”

L. Groarke                   Commentary

 

T. Jovicic                      “New concepts for argument evaluation”

M. Vorobej                  Commentary

 

M. Kagan                     “IL, CT and secret writing”

C. Campolo                 Commentary

 

J. Kalef                        “IL and the philosophy of religion”

D. Cohen                     Commentary

 

F. Kauffeld &

J. Fields                        “Veracity in testimony and gossip”

J. Adler                        Commentary    

 

T. Konishi                    “Establishing informal logic”

A. Gross                      Commentary

 

M. Koszowy                “Concepts of logical fallacy and error”

G. Boger                      Commentary

 

E. Krabbe                    “Pragmatics of deduction”

D. Jacquette                 Commentary

 

T. Kvernbekk               “Narratives as arguments”

J. Davies                      Commentary

 

J. van Laar                   “Ambiguity and nitpicking”

T. Blair                         Commentary

 

J. Novak                      “Syllogisms in philosophical arguments”

R. Yanal                       Commentary

 

A. Ohler                       “Rationality in Pereman and Johnson”

M. Leff                         Commentary

 

R. Pinto                        “Belief, acceptance and argumentation”

P. Loptson                   Commentary

 

 

J. Plug                          “Intentions of legislators”

R. Sullivan                    Commentary

 

P. Rooney                    “Feminism and argumentation”

T. Goodnight                Commentary

 

N. Shackel                   “Vacuity of post modernist methodology”

R. Harris                      Commentary

 

J. Shumake                   “Negotiation of meaning”

M. Linker                     Commentary

 

H. Siegel                      “Goldman on epistemology and education”

A. Goldman                  Commentary

 

F. Snoeck

Henkemans                  “Indicators of argumentation structures”

D. Hitchcock                Commentary

 

J. Sobocan                   “Teaching IL and CT”

S. Bailin                        Commentary

 

C. Tindale                    “Defending acceptability”

R. Johnson                   Commentary

 

D. Turner                     “Rylean account of fallacies”

J. Woods                     Commentary

 

M. Vorobej                  “Thick cogency”

B. Russell                     Commentary

 

J. Wagemans                “Discord between dialectic and rhetoric”

J. Goodwin                   Commentary

 

D. Walton &

C. Reed                       “Schemes in process and product”

R. Pinto                        Commentary

 

M. Weinstein                “Knowledge structures and arguments”

D. Allen                        Commentary

 

J. Woods                     “Resource-based fallacy theory”

L. Powers                    Commentary

 

R. Yanal                       “Linked and convergent reasons - again”

G. Goddu                     Commentary