Keynotes:
A. Alvarez “IL in the Philippines”
C. Gratton Commentary
P. Asquith “Meta-level of informal logic”
R. Binkley Commentary
M. Battersby “Rhetoric of numbers”
A. Colijin Commentary
C. Beam “The fallacies of pity and fear”
E. Feteris Commentary
J.A. Blair “Philosophy of argument and argumentation”
T. Govier Commentary
C. Blatz “The spirit of critical thinking”
D. Turner Commentary
G. Boger “Formal foundation for fallacy theory”
R. George Commentary
C. Campolo “Common ground for conflict resolution”
T. Goodnight Commentary
D. Cohen “Unjust argument theory”
R. Burke Commentary
P. Courtenay-Hall “The ethics of teaching”
M. Gilbert Commentary
F. van Eemeren &
Houtlosser “New developments”
M. Finocchiaro Commentary
E. Feteris “Unacceptable consequences”
D. Walton Commentary
J. Freeman “Progress on the dialectical tier”
H. Hansen Commentary
M. Gaurini “Connectionist coherence”
A. Bailey Commentary
M. Gilbert “The linguistically inexplicable”
C. Blatz Commentary
D. Godden “Deductivism as interpretive strategy”
E. Krabbe Commentary
J. Goddu “Context of an argument”
J. Freeman Commentary
J. Goodwin “Manifestly adequate premises”
J. Hoaglund Commentary
T. Govier “Relevence, emotion and consolation”
J. Bickenbach Commentary
C. Gratton “Using counterexamples”
M. Battersby Commentary
A. Gross “Scientific diagrams as arguments”
F. van Eemeren Commentary
H. Hansen “Presumptions and burdens”
P. Houtlosser Commentary
R. Harris “Rhetoric and incommensurability”
C. Willard Commentary
D. Hatcher “Personal values in argument evaluation”
P. Courtenay-Hall Commentary
D. Hitchcock “Testing in critical thinking”
D. Hatcher Commentary
J. Hoaglund “Truth in informal logic”
D. Allen Commentary
B. Huss “Being careful with paralogisms”
D. Boone Commentary
D. Jacquette “Socrates on rhetoric”
C. Tindale Commentary
R.H. Johnson “Why visual arguments aren’t arguments”
L. Groarke Commentary
T. Jovicic “New concepts for argument evaluation”
M. Vorobej Commentary
M. Kagan “IL, CT and secret writing”
C. Campolo Commentary
J. Kalef “IL and the philosophy of religion”
D. Cohen Commentary
F. Kauffeld &
J. Fields “Veracity in testimony and gossip”
J. Adler Commentary
T. Konishi “Establishing informal logic”
A. Gross Commentary
M. Koszowy “Concepts of logical fallacy and error”
G. Boger Commentary
E. Krabbe “Pragmatics of deduction”
D. Jacquette Commentary
T. Kvernbekk “Narratives as arguments”
J. Davies Commentary
J. van Laar “Ambiguity and nitpicking”
T. Blair Commentary
J. Novak “Syllogisms in philosophical arguments”
R. Yanal Commentary
A. Ohler “Rationality in Pereman and Johnson”
M. Leff Commentary
R. Pinto “Belief, acceptance and argumentation”
P. Loptson Commentary
J. Plug “Intentions of legislators”
R. Sullivan Commentary
P. Rooney “Feminism and argumentation”
T. Goodnight Commentary
N. Shackel “Vacuity of post modernist methodology”
R. Harris Commentary
J. Shumake “Negotiation of meaning”
M. Linker Commentary
H. Siegel “Goldman on epistemology and education”
A. Goldman Commentary
F. Snoeck
Henkemans “Indicators of argumentation structures”
D. Hitchcock Commentary
J. Sobocan “Teaching IL and CT”
S. Bailin Commentary
C. Tindale “Defending acceptability”
R. Johnson Commentary
D. Turner “Rylean account of fallacies”
J. Woods Commentary
M. Vorobej “Thick cogency”
B. Russell Commentary
J. Wagemans “Discord between dialectic and rhetoric”
J. Goodwin Commentary
D. Walton &
C. Reed “Schemes in process and product”
R. Pinto Commentary
M. Weinstein “Knowledge structures and arguments”
D. Allen Commentary
J. Woods “Resource-based fallacy theory”
L. Powers Commentary
R. Yanal “Linked and convergent reasons - again”
G. Goddu Commentary