| 
 
 
 
 |  | 
   
  
    | Sample Responses: | 
   
  
    | 
	 | 
   
  
        | 
   
  
     
      
       | 
   
  
    | Assignment on Piaget 
	and Vygotsky with typical 
	percentages getting the 
	"right" answer. | 
   
  
    | 
	 3. Which is the most 
	important contribution made by Piaget with respect to cognitive development? 
	
	A) Cognitive development at any stage is 
	limited by earlier sensorimotor experiences. 
	
	B) Children are actively 
	engaged in constructing their understanding of the world. (29% of a previous class got this one) 
	
	C) Children pass through each stage of 
	cognitive development in a fixed sequence. 
	
	D) The intellectual development of children 
	has four broad age-approximated stages. 
	4. Jerome, who is five 
	years old, happens to see a complex mathematical proof in his mother’s old 
	university textbook. After he looked at the mathematical proof, it would be 
	most likely that 
	
	A) both assimilation and accommodation have 
	occurred. 
	
	B) neither assimilation 
	nor accommodation have occurred.
	(76% 0f a previous class got this one.) 
	
	C) accommodation has occurred, but not 
	assimilation. 
	
	D) assimilation has occurred, but not 
	accommodation. 
	6. Which statement best 
	reflects Piaget’s position on the issue of speeding up cognitive 
	development? 
	
	A) Speeding up cognitive development is a 
	teacher’s role. 
	
	B) Acceleration is both 
	inefficient and useless.
	(76% of a previous class got this one) 
	
	C) Keeping cognitive development “on track” 
	is a teacher’s role. 
	D) Acceleration is effective for only the brightest students. 
	7. An application of 
	Vygotsky’s zone of proximal development concept would include 
	
	A) requiring the student to work completely 
	independently, regardless of success or failure. 
	
	B) making new tasks 
	slightly beyond the student’s current level of ability
	(76% of a previous class got this one) 
	
	C) not introducing new tasks until 
	prerequisite tasks are satisfactorily mastered. 
	                 
	D) using highly structured materials to introduce new content rather than 
	semi-structured tasks.   | 
   
  
    | Weapons | 
   
  
    
    
      
        
          
            | 
                | 
            
               
            
            Subject: 
            Individual & Society  | 
            
             
              
            
            Grade:11  | 
            
             
              
            
            Strand: 
            OPEN                                                      | 
           
          
            | 
                | 
            
             
              
            
            Developed by: 
            Bob Slater, Andrew Holmes, Keith Gale, Pete, Dana  | 
            
             
              
            
            Development Date: 
            Wednesday, October 
            02, 2002  | 
           
          
            | 
                | 
            
             
              
            
            Overall expectations: 
            
            Describe the role 
            society plays in the lives of children and families   | 
            
             
              
            
            Specific Expectations:. 
            
            Raise awareness of 
            weapons in school and the legal implications and philosophical 
            reasons behind the restrictions of weapons possession.  | 
           
          
            | 
                | 
            
             
              
            
               | 
           
          
            | 
                | 
            
             
              
            
            Specific Expectations 
            (Learning Expectations)  | 
            
             
              
            
            Related Achievement 
            Chart Categories  | 
           
          
            | 
                | 
            
             
              
            
               | 
            
             
              
            
            KNOWLEDGE/ 
            
            UNDERSTANDING  | 
            
             
              
            
            INQUIRY  | 
            
             
              
            
            COMMUNICATION  | 
            
             
              
            
            MAKING CONNECTIONS  | 
           
          
            | 
                | 
            
             
              
            
            Raise awareness of 
            weapons in school and the legal implications and philosophical 
            reasons behind the restrictions of weapons possession.  | 
            
             
              
            
            ☺  | 
            
             
              
            
            ☺  | 
            
             
              
            
            ☺  | 
            
             
              
            
            ☺  | 
           
          
            |   | 
            
             
            Prior Knowledge 
            required:  
            
            Understanding of the 
            basis for law. 
            
            Understanding of the 
            principle of ‘common good’.  | 
           
          
            | 
                | 
            
             
              
            
            Assessment Tasks:  
            1.  Evaluate students in their contribution/participation in class 
            discussion and debate. 
            
                                             2.  Have students express their 
            thoughts (1 page min) on the factors that would cause some students 
            to bring weapons to  | 
           
          
            | 
             
              school. (homework) 
              
               | 
            
                | 
           
          
            | 
                | 
            
             
              
            
            Teaching/Learning 
            Strategies and Planning Notes: 
            
            TIME: 
            50 min. 
            
            MATERIALS:  
            1.  A brochure from the local police department identifying what a 
            weapon is, what a concealed weapon is. 
            
            
                                             2.  A police officer in person to 
            discuss weapons and to share personal experiences.  | 
           
          
            | 
                | 
            
             
              
            
            Step by Step Instructions: 
            
            1.       
            Start class by asking if anyone has ever known someone 
            (friend, acquaintance etc) to bring a weapon to school. 
            
            2.       
            Discuss the ‘legalese’ regarding weapon possession in both 
            Canadian and school law. 
            
            3.       
            Discuss with the class why someone would bring a weapon to 
            school despite the dire implications of doing so. 
            
            4.       
            Make a list of reasons for having a weapon and provide 
            alternatives to each. 
            
            5.       
            Organize into groups of 4 and have them discuss the 
            implications of the hypothetical scenario where bring weapons to 
            school is made legal.  | 
           
          
            | 
                | 
            
             
              
            
            
            Modifications/Adaptations:
             
            
            1.  If a police officer 
            is available then go over the above mentioned ideas with him/her, 
            then step back and allow the officer to present the  material as an 
            expert.  | 
           
          
          
            |   | 
              | 
              | 
              | 
              | 
              | 
              | 
           
          
         
       
      
        
      
        
          
            
            
             
 
                 
            Assessment/Evaluation Strategies
            
                                                                                               
              | 
           
          
            | 
             
              
            
            Formative:  Whether 
            an officer is present or not the teacher should make note of student 
            participation. 
            
               | 
            
             
              
            
            Summative: 
             Have students express their thoughts (1 page min) on the factors 
            that would cause some students to bring weapons to school. 
            (homework)  | 
           
         
       
      
        
      
        
          
            | 
             
              
            
                     Resources 
              | 
           
          
            | 
             
              
            
            Books/Videos: 
            
            Weapons use in Canadian 
            schools 
            
            by Sandra Gail Walker 
            
            Ministry of Supply and 
            Services Canada; ASIN: 066261304X  | 
            
             
              
            
            Texts:  
            
               | 
            
             
              
            
            CD-ROMS: 
            
               | 
            
             
              
            
            Internet: 
            
            http://www.ncpc.org/2schools.htm  | 
            
             
              
            
            Other: 
            
            Police 
            Officer  | 
           
         
       
     
    
    Appendix  
    
    Notes on Erikson’s Eight Stages of Psychosocial 
    Development 
    According to Erik Ericson, the 
    children taking part in this class (early adolescents) would be at the 
    “Identity vs Role Confusion” stage of their Psychosocial Development.  
    Typically during this stage that teenager is achieving his identity in 
    occupations, gender roles, politics, and religion. 
    It is the belief of this group that 
    the most common reason for bringing a weapon to school for this group would 
    be ‘peer pressure’.  It is believed that many of the students guilty of 
    bringing a weapon to school would be doing so to gain social standing 
    amongst their peers or to “look cool”.  While these students must be 
    reprimanded for their offence (according to provincial regulations) it is 
    our belief that they should be reprimanded in a kind, discrete, and 
    understanding way. 
    
    Notes on Kohlberg’s Stages of Moral Development 
    According to Lawrence Kohlberg, the 
    children taking part in this class would be in either Stage 4: 
     Law and order Orientation or Stage 5:  Social Contract 
    Orientation 
    Due to the seriousness of this topic 
    it is important that the teacher recognize what level his/her class is at 
    when approaching this topic.  If the class is at stage 4 then a “black and 
    white” approach to weapons in the school should be used.  If the class is 
    clearly at stage 5 then a more abstract approach should be taken. 
  | 
   
  
    | Simpsons... | 
   
  
    | 
	 Showing media literate 
	thinking 
	
		- Which stage of Erikson’s psycho-social development 
		does Bart seem to be in?
 		
			- Initiative
 
			- Industry 
			(71.2% of a previous group got this one) 
 
			- Identity
 
			- Intimacy
 
		 
		 
		- Which stage of Erikson’s psycho-social development 
		does Martin (the tattler, and the one who reminds the teacher about 
		Bart’s desk arrangement) seem to be in?
 		
			- Initiative
 
			- Industry 
			(22.9% of a previous group got this one) 
 
			- Identity
 
			- Intimacy
 
		 
		 
		- Which stage of Erikson’s psycho-social development 
		does Homer, the father, seem to be in?
 		
			- Initiative
 
			- Industry
 
			- Identity
 
			- 
			Intimacy(59.3% of a previous group got this one) Difficulty 
			
 
		 
		 
		- When Bart cheats on the test, what level of moral 
		reasoning is he showing?
 		
			- Stage 1
 
			- Stage 2 
			(82.2% of a previous group got this one) 
 
			- Stage 3
 
			- Stage 4
 
		 
		 
		- When Martin reminds the teacher about Bart’s 
		required seating arrangement, what level of moral reasoning is Martin 
		showing?
 		
			- Stage 1
 
			- Stage 2 (5.9% 
			of a previous group got this one)
 
			- Stage 3
 
			- Stage 4
 
		 
		 
		- When Principal Skinner has the opportunity to send 
		Bart to a private school for the gifted what level of moral reasoning is 
		he showing?
 		
			- Stage 1
 
			- Stage 2(94.9% 
			of a previous group got this one)
 
			- Stage 3
 
			- Stage 4
 
		 
		 
		- When Bart repents, what level of moral reasoning 
		is he showing?
 		
			- Stage 1
 
			- Stage 2 
			(33.9% of a previous group got this one)
 
			- Stage 3
 
			- Stage 4
 
		 
		 
		- Who showed the highest level of moral behaviour in 
		the video?
 		
			- The bright and gifted kids (like Martin, 
			Ethan, Sidney, Sophia) 
 
			- The school personnel (principals, 
			psychologists, teachers)
 
			- Homer
 
			- Marge (84.7% 
			of a previous group got this one)
 
		 
		 
	 
  | 
   
  
    | 
     Orchestra 
    Conductor Metaphor  | 
   
  
    | 
     Teacher 
    as Orchestra Conductor 
    By: Group 
    404
    
                Teacher as orchestra and 
    students as musicians---If this were the metaphor that informs the teaching, 
    then a few aspects of education would be depicted.   
    
                Firstly, it would be important 
    for the teacher/conductor to realize the individual differences. Just as 
    there are many strings and many woodwinds in an orchestra, so there will be 
    a variety of students in the classroom, such as children with different 
    cultures or with exceptionalities.  Whereas the traditional method of 
    teaching would impose a strict vision of treating all students the same (an 
    orchestra of violins), the constructivism approach would embrace the 
    differences and use them to its advantage: group activities (grouping 
    strings with strings), peer teaching (first chairs).  
    Additionally, being constructivist, the teacher would be sure to create 
    many different groups throughout the year, making a point to have the 
    students participate with other students who might be very different from 
    them.  The students could develop some enlightening social skills in this 
    way.  Looking at the conductor, this could be seen as grouping different 
    instruments together for small individual bands.  Similar to 
    an orchestra of various instruments, a 
    classroom embracing differences would have more depth. 
                Secondly, it is essential to 
    know that the students/musician play a central role in mediating and 
    controlling learning. The teachers/conductors serve in the role of guides, 
    monitors, coaches, tutors and facilitators. The focus should be 
    students/musician (constructivism), NOT teacher/conductor. The teacher would 
    simply aid in the direction of the students (conducting) and in setting the 
    guidelines (pulse), however it would be the students who would be creating 
    the learning atmosphere (the music itself).  This is not to say that the 
    role of the teacher/conductor is unimportant, without the conductor’s 
    guidance, harmony would quickly turn to cacophony.  This attitude would fly 
    in the face of the teacher/jug and student/mug idea of teaching; this 
    constructivism model would have the emphasis on students learning for 
    themselves while the teacher would have the crucial role of guide or leader. 
    The teacher/conductor can always expect effort from the students/musicians.  
    Empowering the students/musicians, the teacher/conductor would encourage the 
    students/musicians to solve their problems through discussion, trial and 
    error/practice, and inquiry.  The teacher/conductor would assist in the 
    problem solving when needed. The teacher/conductor however should not try to 
    show each individual student/musician how to play their instrument/learn, as 
    this would consume far too much time and energy.  It would be the role of 
    the teacher to listen for the occasional discord and then focus attention on 
    that specific student when the time comes.  For the most part, grouping 
    together students with similar learning patterns/instruments of varying 
    levels would be useful, especially when dealing with assignments, both 
    inside and outside the classroom. 
    
    Thirdly, collaborative and 
    cooperative learning are important in order to expose the students/musicians 
    to alternative viewpoints and to improve their social skills. Assigning work 
    to groups in which there are varying levels of aptitude would create an 
    atmosphere ripe for peer teaching as well as socialization. The 
    teacher/conductor could even distribute sections of the lesson/score to the 
    various groups of students/musicians who would then come together as a 
    class/orchestra in order to put everything together.  This could be done for 
    both in class and out of class assignments.  However, as always the teacher 
    should be ready for guidance and in the case of true discord, to take a 
    firmer hand and become more active.  Even individual assignments could be 
    done in the same manner; students/musicians must study/practice on their own 
    in order to prepare for the big show. 
    
                Fourthly, a good 
    conductor/ teacher should know “How is each individual student/ musician 
    smart?” NOT “How smart are they?”(Multi-intelligence). The teacher/conductor 
    would have to realize that not every student/musician would excel at every 
    learning pattern/instrument.  It would be up to the teacher/conductor not to 
    force a pattern/instrument on the student/musician but to accept their 
    limitations and help them to find the pattern/instruments in which they 
    excel.  The teacher/conductor should also realize that not every 
    student/musician will excel at every subject/composer and should be aware of 
    the limitations of each individual.  It would also be important for the 
    teacher/conductor to realize that not every orchestra/class 
    plays/understands the same topic/music in the same way, nor should they.  
    There should be room for creativity, but this within the guidelines set 
    forth by the teacher/conductor.  
    
                The last but not 
    least, the teacher/conductor should never ignore one off-key 
    student/musician because only one note of discord creates cacophony.  | 
   
  
    |   | 
   
  
    | 
     
    Mistakes Reflection (Group 401) 
    Mistakes 
    are used as a powerful resource, which leads to valuable life lessons.  
    Mistakes are made by everyone, and depending on the environment, they can be 
    useful or harmful.  An important aspect to learning is “trial and error”. 
    Wrong answers are the heart of the scientific discovery process.  By 
    discovering what’s “wrong”, through exploring and examining what doesn’t 
    work, we eventually figure out what does work.   Children readily learn from 
    hands on experience, and these experiences develop skills which are honed 
    through error. Mistakes are viewed as a tool of analysis, and teachers play 
    a key role in defining a mistake.    
                 Mistakes can provide 
    insight into a child’s thought process.  Mistakes can show how the child is 
    approaching a problem, and where the mistake is being generated in the 
    thought process.  An example would be the math problems shown on the CD.  In 
    some instances the first computation was correct but the process broke down 
    in the second step.  This aids the teacher in targeting the area in which 
    the student need help.  There can also be a great deal of difficulty in 
    finding the “root problem”.  As a teacher, it is important to talk to the 
    child, to understand the child’s thought process.  Using the constructivist 
    method of teaching, a teacher can make a discussion about a mistake rather 
    than a harmful statement.   
    There may 
    be numerous reasons why a mistake is made.  A child could be unmotivated, 
    may have received insufficient instruction or may not have reached the 
    proper cognitive development level.  Mistakes can provide a teacher with 
    insight into a child’s development, and possibly other factors such as home 
    environment that are affecting the child’s learning.  Listening to child’s 
    errors both verbally and in written work will provide the teacher with 
    critical insight regarding the child’s learning environment outside of 
    school. 
    As a 
    teacher, we can teach students, how they deal with their mistakes is more 
    important than the fact a mistake was made.  As a leader in the classroom, 
    it is important to model that mistakes are manageable, and to demonstrate to 
    students how to learn from your mistakes.  Tell your students what they can 
    do after making mistakes  For example, talk with someone who knows more 
    about the particular subject area, or just reflect on the mistakes by 
    themselves, try to figure out the reason, and avoid it next time. 
    Students 
    should be encouraged to try new things knowing they will not be ridiculed 
    for making an error.  Acknowledging a mistake is a hard task to accomplish, 
    but very worthwhile.  Even as a teacher/leader, we all will make mistakes, 
    and students will recognize how we deal with these mistakes.  As a 
    professional we need to model that mistakes are manageable.  Owning up to 
    our mistake and figuring out a new way to approach the problem, gives our 
    students an incredible statement of optimism.       
     Group 404 
    Chad Brown 
    Baojuan Ji 
    Steven Burns 
    Jason Leili 
    Denise Mayor 
    Martha Neill  | 
   
  
    |   | 
   
  
    | 
     
    
    Managing Behaviour 
    
    Group 401 
    
    Increasing Behaviour 
    Scenario 1  
    
    Shaping could be used by a teacher with a 
    class to increase and improve the study habits/behaviour of the students. 
    Although not typically done by teachers, encouraging students to study would 
    work better if someone did it with them. "Task analysis" should begin on a 
    small scale by preparing students first for individual tests: chapters, 
    diagrams, persons covered, and concepts. This would need to occur several 
    times so that the students could see the value/reward in the behaviour. 
    Later "task analysis" could be provided on a more macro level by breaking 
    down studying into chunks, time management, study notes, reading, weekly 
    note review, etc. This would be time well spent by a teacher because it 
    isn't something many students are helped with at home. It worked with my 
    teenage son and me. 
    
    Scenario 2 
    
    Positive Practice is used to replace one 
    behaviour with another.  When students make a mistake, they must correct it 
    as soon as possible and practice the correct response.  An example could be 
    one in regards to classroom rules.  If the students have a certain way of 
    going into the class such as lining up by the door and walking into the 
    class at the teachers cue, and for some reason or other they do not do that, 
    then the teacher should make them line back up outside and walk in the way 
    they normally do.  Another example dealing with a student individually could 
    be one seen in many schools if not all, children running down the hallways.  
    This kind of behaviour can be solved using this practice.  The student 
    should be stopped, and should be sent back to his/her original location and 
    allowed to correct that behaviour by walking to their destination. 
    
    Scenario 3 
    The 
    Premack Principle increases both learning and 
    positive behaviour by using reinforcers (privileges and rewards) that are 
    readily available in the classroom other than teacher praise.  
    High-frequency behaviour (a preferred activity) can be an effective 
    reinforcer for low-frequency behaviour (a less-preferred activity).  To use 
    the Premack Principle effectively, the low-frequency or less-preferred 
    activity must happen first.  For example, the students want to do a 
    particular activity or read a fun book, but first they must finish their 
    math or grammar lesson, if the students are attentive and productive, their 
    reward will be to spend the time the way they would like, reading the fun 
    book or participating in an activity.  This principle is also known as 
    "Grandma Rule":  We do what I want first and then you may do what you want. 
    
    Decreasing Behaviour 
    Scenario 1 
    "Response 
    Cost" could be used in a situation wherein students repeatedly talk while 
    the teacher is talking, to discourage the behaviour. Despite a warning 
    several students have not stopped talking. The next and final warning 
    advises that the students who continue to talk will have their names 
    recorded on the board and will owe time to be repaid after school, at recess 
    or at lunch. Alternatively, they could lose privileges such as computer 
    time. In my limited experience, this appears to work better with junior 
    level students. It seems that intermediate level students are simply 
    physiologically unable to stop talking. 
    
    Scenario 2  
    “Social 
    Isolation”, though it is a controversial method, can be quite effective.  
    The following example is a little different from the 5 to 10 minutes of 
    isolation stated in the text, but the desired outcomes are similar. If a 
    class is given a set of rules whereby points are awarded and taken away for 
    completing or not completing certain tasks within a given month and the 
    rules state that the students are required to have at least half of the set 
    amount of points for the month or they will not be able to participate in 
    "fun" school events such as a monthly class party, the threat of social 
    isolation could work as a deterrent for negative behaviour.  If a student is 
    constantly misbehaving, forgetting supplies or doesn't complete their 
    homework and loses too many points, they will not be able to attend the 
    class party.  Further more they would have to go to an empty room and do 
    work while their classmates were having fun back in the classroom.  This 
    punishment could create a sense of responsibility in the student thereby 
    having the positive effect of the student wanting to correct his/her 
    negative behaviours and try harder to maintain his/her points for the next 
    class party. 
    
    Scenario 3 
    
    Reprimanding a student can take two 
    forms, loud, public reprimands and quiet, private reprimands.  Since many 
    students misbehave in order to achieve attention, a loud public reprimand 
    would not be appropriate.  In this case quiet, private reprimands would give 
    the student the attention he/she was looking for and therefore the 
    disruptive behaviour would decrease.  Reprimanding a problem student quietly 
    so only they can hear give the teacher and student time to discuss the 
    problem or situation and a probable solution which seems much more 
    effective.  When reprimands are not used too often in the classroom, student 
    will generally respond quickly and the classroom takes on a positive, warm 
    environment.  | 
   
  
    |   | 
   
  
    |   | 
   
  
    |   | 
   
  
    |   | 
   
  |