Day 9: Goldman on Reliabilism

      Key Methodological Moves

      Goldman on Justification & Knowledge

      Justification

      Processes and Methods

      Goldman on Interpersonal and Intrapersonal Justification

      Reread Brandom’s “Insights and Blindspots of Reliabilism”; have a look at Klein’s “Useful False Beliefs”

 

Key Methodological Moves
(with Respect to Knowledge & Justification)

      Epistemic (normative or prescriptive) terms are defined in terms of non-epistemic (non-normative or descriptive) terms

      The rules being sought are not guidance rules

 

Goldman on Justification & Knowledge

      Justification (roughly): belief formed from a reliable process, and no other reliable process exists that the agent could or should have used that would have changed the agent’s belief

      Knowledge (roughly): reliable true belief where there are no relevant alternatives that pose a problem

 

Goldman on Justification & Knowledge

      In earlier work, Goldman stressed that we need an account of justification to fill out the theory of knowledge

      Both the accounts of justification and knowledge were externalist & reliabilist

      We will focus on his view of justification

 

Justification

      S’s believing p is justified at t iff

  (a) p is permitted by a right system of J-rules, &

  (b) the permission is not undermined by S’s cognitive state at t.

 

      What is the criterion of rightness for J-rules?

  reliability

 

Processes and Methods

      What are processes and methods?

      Methods have to be justifiably (reliably) acquired: the Gertrude example

 

Goldman on Interpersonal & Intrapersonal Justification

      Why is intrapersonal treated as more basic than interpersonal?

  (1) issue of theexistence of other people, minds

  (2) interpersonal reason giving depends on intrapersonal justification

  (3) can be justified (and know) without being able to state reasons  (either due to complexity or for historical/memory reasons)

  (4) someone could be justified even if no one else is bright enough to understand the basis of their justification