Day 16: Setting Up Foundationalism & Coherentism

      The Regress Problem

      Some Possible Responses

      Foundationalism and Coherentism

      Foundationalisms w.r.t. Justification or Knowledge

      Coherentisms w.r.t. Justification or Knowledge

      A Priori vs. A Posteriori (Empirical)

      Read part one of “Critical Notice: BonJour and Sosa on Epistemic Justification

 

The Regress Problem

      Assume: for every p and q,

    (a) p is justified only if p is inferred from q; (i.e. one proposition is justified only if it is inferred from another proposition), and

    (b) q must be justified for p to be justified.  (I.e. the inferred proposition can only be justified if the supporting proposition is justified.)

      What happens if we assume both (a) and (b)?

 

Some Possible Responses

      Some (though not all) possible responses to the regress problem:

    (1) Regress terminates with beliefs that are not justified.

    (2) Regress may terminate with beliefs that are justified but not in need of further inferential justification

    (3) Regress never terminates.

    (4) Regress may circle back on itself.

    (5) There is a kind of nonlinear or mutually reinforcing justification that either terminates or dissolves the regress (both local and non-local variants on this).

 

Foundationalism and Coherentism

      What are the essential commitments of foundationalism?

      What are the essential commitments of coherentism?

      Are hybrids of the above possible?

 

Foundationalisms w.r.t. Justification or Knowledge

      Starting with non-sensory considerations, or sense data or sense experience, or perceptions of physical objects

      Quality of foundations: infallible, certain, unrevisable, indefeasible, fallible, uncertain, revisable, defeasible, probabilistic, . . . foundations

      Internalist vs. externalist (eg, reliabilist or causal) foundationalism

 

Coherentisms w.r.t. Justification or Knowledge

      Local vs. Global

      What sorts of things contribute to coherence?

      Internalist vs. externalist approaches?

 

A Priori vs. A Posteriori (Non-empirical vs. Empirical)

      What is a priori knowledge?

      What is a posteriori knowledge?

      Can you be a foundationalist with respect to one and a coherentist with respect to the other?