Day 12:
The Social Articulation of the Space of Reasons
•
Semantics and Epistemology
•
The Conceptual Blindspot of Reliabilism
•
Reliabilism and Naturalism
•
Blindspots and Insights
•
Brandom on the Social Articulation of Reasons
•
Read ENE: 63 – 82 (Independent Study)
Semantics and Epistemology
•
Semantics and the belief condition:
–
According to Brandom, what is a key difference between mere reliable
indicators (iron filings, landmines, tree rings…) and believers?
–
What epistemic conclusion does Brandom draw from how he answers the
preceding question?
The
Conceptual Blind Spot of Reliabilism
•
According to Brandom, what is the conceptual blind spot of reliabilism?
•
What does Brandom say about examples of proper believers who have arrived
at a true belief using a reliable process or method but are unaware of their
reliability? (I.e. what does Brandom say about the founding insight of
reliabilism?)
Reliabilism and Naturalism
•
What are people talking about when they talk about naturalizing
epistemology?
•
In what sense are reliabilists interested in naturalizing epistemology?
•
What is the point of the barn facades example? What is “Goldman’s
Insight”?
•
How does Brandom use Goldman’s insight against Goldman’s reliabilism?
•
The “problem of the reference class” or the “generality problem”
Blind Spots and Insights
•
According to Brandom:
•
What is the conceptual blind spot of reliabilism?
•
What is the naturalistic blind spot of reliabilism?
•
What is the founding insight of reliabilism?
•
What is Goldman’s Insight?
•
What is the implicit insight of reliabilism?
Brandom on the Social Articulation of Reasons
•
According to Brandom, what does knowledge attribution involve?
•
What is commitment?
•
What is entitlement?
•
What is endorsement?
•
Key to the above is the difference between assessor/attributor of
knowledge and the subject/target of knowledge attribution