Days
20 & 21: Imperatives & Objectivity
Objectivity in Practical Reason
Maxims and Imperatives
Universalization Formulations
Means-end Formulation
The Kingdom of Ends
Read FPMM, section 3
Read Scruton, chapter 6
Objectivity in
Practical Reason
We can ask, What does it mean to say the world is flat or round? When
we understand what it means, we can ask, Is the world flat or round?
Similarly, we can ask, What does it mean to say there is objectivity in
morality? When we understand what it means, we can ask, Is morality objective
(or objectively binding)?
Objectivity in
Practical Reason
FPMM section 2
is not an attempt to show that morality is objectively binding; it
is an attempt to explain what it would mean to say that morality is
objectively binding. The attempt to show morality is objective (or, at least,
to motivate acceptance of such a morality) is postponed until section 3 of
FPMM, and the CPrR.
Objectivity in
Practical Reason
Some important passages on objectivity: FPMM 25, 35, 39, 40-2, 44,
47-48, 53, 54, 55, 57, 60, 61, 70, 81, 82
These passages make a few things clear:
For Kant, something being objective is associated with it being
binding on all rational beings
Kant does not think he is establishing the objectivity of morality in
section 2 of FPMM
He sees himself as taking up the issue in section 3
Maxims and
Imperatives
What is a maxim?
What is an imperative?
What is a hypothetical imperative?
What is a categorical imperative?
Duty, moral law, categorical imperative, and objectivity (or the
objectively binding)
Universalization
Formulations
The various formulations of the categorical imperative are tests for
whether subjective maxims could be objectively binding
Universal law (section 1) and Universal law of nature formulations
(sections 1 & 2)
Universalization
Formulations
Applications of the universalization test
Perfect duties
Imperfect duties
Means-end
Formulation
Autonomy and being and end in itself
The means-end formulation/test
Applications
The Kingdom of Ends
The kingdom of ends is the community of rational, autonomous beings; it
is the community of ends-in-themselves
The kingdom of ends formulation/test
The alleged equivalence of the various formulations/tests
Remainder of section 2
Discussion
Duty, desire, emotion (& objectivity)
Varieties of agents and patients (& objectivity)
Questions about how to apply the tests/formulations, and questions about
some of the results (& objectivity)